Animal Protein Subverts Health

Posted by:

|

On:

|

, ,
Animal Protein Subverts Health

Animal Protein Subverts Health



To embark on the serpent’s journey means venturing beyond the confines of consensus reality and conventional consciousness. For the initiate, shedding skin represents a powerful process of renewal, a transformative release from the old way of life.

The serpent inspires us to let go of outgrown elements of ourselves, beliefs, and societal ideas, enabling us to transcend limitations and restrictions. Although it may be challenging and occasionally distressing to leave behind an old self or belief, we ultimately recognize its necessity.

Only by shedding what confines us can we liberate ourselves from our self-imposed confinement and elevate our understanding of life and consciousness. There is a deeper process unfolding that enables us to rediscover our true selves and reconnect with our authentic identity.

Both the creators of this blog are not only passionate bookworms but also possess a wealth of experience. Speaking from my own perspective, I have been committed to following the serpent’s way for the past six years.

Prior to this, I spent fifteen years as a dedicated weight lifter, sustaining myself on a diet primarily composed of steak, tuna, and eggs. The first hurdle I encountered on my journey along the serpent’s way was the abrupt transition from a meat-centric diet to adopting a raw food vegan lifestyle.

Transitioning to a vegan diet stands out as one of the top life choices I’ve made in my forty-seven years. Within the initial two weeks, I experienced a remarkable tenfold improvement in my health. I felt more agile, energetic, and stronger, with a noticeable surge in my energy levels.

My bowel movements became more regular and cleaner. Embracing a vegan lifestyle brought a sense of harmony to my mind, body, and soul, fostering a deeper connection with nature and enhancing my mental strength.

Drawing from my personal encounters and extensive research of ancient texts, I have come to understand that embracing a vegan or vegetarian way of life is paramount when embarking on a spiritual journey or striving to attain heightened awareness/consciousness.

This dietary choice holds great significance, particularly in terms of activating the inner serpent, also known as Kundalini. Consuming death will not grant immortality. Meat is devoid of life. I choose to fuel my body with living foods like plants, fruits, and nuts, which sustain my vitality.

We could easily expand this introduction by delving into the ethical and moral implications rooted in the Universal law of love. Additionally, we could explore the negative consequences of bad karma.

Store-bought meat consumption raises valid concerns about our physical health, given the utilization of antibiotics and chemicals to maximize output. Moreover, the inhumane treatment and slaughter of animals cannot be ignored.

It is clear that the dark sorcerers controlling this system have the ability to create such circumstances, and their intentions to spiritually enslave humanity are hinted at in various parts of this blog. We will save these discussions for a later post.

Considering the fundamental principle that everything is energy, I strongly advocate for adopting a vegan diet based on my personal experience as a practitioner of semen retention for the past three years.

It is disheartening to observe that the NoFap and semen retention communities on platforms like YouTube and social media overlook the correlation between veganism and semen retention, failing to promote this vital connection.

Is it your genuine belief that a diet primarily consisting of meat is suitable for those practicing semen retention? Do you truly think that embracing vibrations like anger, lust, fear, and aggressiveness will assist you in transcending your primal instincts?

This blog provides a comprehensive guide to unlocking your inner serpent (Kundalini) and achieving self-mastery. The pivotal aspect is the preservation and transmutation of sexual energy, which serves as the bedrock for this awakening and the ultimate mastery of one’s own being. A meat-centric diet has no place on this profound journey.

Prior to discussing the main subject, it is important to note that my perspective is shaped by my years of dedicated weightlifting experience. I used to believe that animal protein, or protein in general, was necessary for maximizing muscle gains.

However, transitioning to a plant-based diet did not lead to a decrease in muscle mass for me. The reduction in muscle size was actually due to shorter weightlifting sessions, increased yoga and cardio, and a shift towards consuming fewer, larger meals instead of six to eight small meals daily.

This article has the potential to provoke intense reactions from numerous individuals, much like our previous discussions on contentious topics such as fluoride, the porn industry, GMOs, and vaccines, which we haven’t yet addressed.

As previously mentioned in this blog and other sections, there has been an enduring plot since ancient times to spiritually enslave humanity through the utilization of black magic and digital means.

Among the many strategies employed by these entities, the consumption of meat and the slaughter of animals, who are affectionate beings created by a divine force, are just a few. To conclude this introduction, let’s explore a gnostic perspective on the significance of the serpent.

The serpent’s role is that of a trigger and a truth-teller. “Attain wisdom by consuming knowledge,” the serpent advises Eve, “you will not meet your end.” Similar to how the serpent advised goddesses in the past, the Naga in Genesis leads Eve towards enlightenment via the Tree of Knowledge.

Eve heeds the serpent’s words and, upon tasting the fruit, enters into a unique state of consciousness. The serpent’s assertion is confirmed: Adam and Eve do not perish from eating the fruit, but instead awakened


Animal Protein Subverts Health

Aqiyl Aniys stated in his book Alkaline Plant Based Diet, he embarked on his alkaline plant-based journey by embracing Dr. Sebi’s healing approach. Disease was attributed to acidifying and mucus-producing foods such as meat, dairy, and processed foods.

These foods created an acidic environment that fueled disease growth and hindered organ function. On the other hand, non-GMO and minimally hybridized plant foods alkalized the body, creating a hostile environment for disease. Additionally, they oxygenated the body and provided essential minerals and phytonutrients to support organ health.

Aqiyl Aniys stated throughout his journey of healing, he made sure to continue his exploration of natural plant foods and herbs based on Dr. Sebi’s teachings. To enhance his understanding, he actively participated in Dr. Colin Campbell’s plant-based nutrition certificate program.

This program not only expanded his knowledge but also offered a scientific viewpoint that perfectly aligned with the traditional medicinal principles he had already acquired. It further confirmed Dr. Sebi’s stance on the negative consequences of consuming animal protein.

Dr. Colin Campbell, previously a fervent advocate for the consumption of animal protein, firmly believed that meat and dairy could effectively address malnutrition on a global scale. However, his perspective underwent a profound change as he conducted his groundbreaking epidemiological study, the China Project.

This research opened his eyes to the remarkable advantages of adopting a whole food plant-based diet. Consequently, Dr. Colin Campbell came to the realization that animal protein was not the savior he had previously perceived it to be.

The push for animal protein consumption stemmed from a 1914 study comparing animal protein and plant protein. Researchers found that rats consuming animal protein experienced quicker growth than those consuming plant protein.

This trend was consistent across various studies conducted at the time, leading to the conclusion that animal protein was more beneficial for proper nutrition due to its ability to support accelerated growth.

Due to its similarity to our own composition, animal protein is synthesized more easily by the body, promoting faster growth. While plants do offer essential building blocks, they are not present in the ideal ratio for quick synthesis and rapid growth.

Researchers proposed that plant protein, which supports slower growth, may have a lower biological value compared to animal protein. This resulted in animal protein being hailed as a top-quality protein and receiving a “Class A” classification.

Meanwhile, plant protein was relegated to a “Class B” status, leading to its gradual neglect. As a consequence, vegans and vegetarians were constantly questioned about their protein sources.

The consumption of animal protein became deeply rooted in American society, associated with superior health. Health organizations began endorsing meat consumption as crucial for optimal health, emphasizing its role in fostering accelerated growth.

The issue with promoting meat consumption is it also supports the proliferation of cancer. Scientists have long been aware of the connection between consuming meat and the development of cancer.

However, proving causation has been a challenge, enabling industries that rely on animal products to use various tactics such as advertising, marketing, and lobbying to emphasize the importance of animal protein.

Despite numerous studies indicating that the consumption of animal protein contributes to cancer development, it remained the dominant choice. Dr. Colin Campbell’s investigations revealed a notable surge in cancer cases as animal protein consumption rose from 10 percent to 20 percent of the diet.

In contrast, there was no similar link found between cancer development and plant protein. Plant proteins, with their slightly mismatched amino acid compositions, are also less efficient at stimulating unwanted growth. Strangely, scientists failed to grasp this relationship between protein and disease.



Frances Moore Lappe, the renowned author of the widely-read 1971 book Diet for a Small Planet, has recently advocated for a vegetarian diet as a solution to global hunger. However, she expressed concerns about the diet’s ability to provide sufficient variety and quantity of protein necessary for maintaining good health.

This raised the notion that plant protein was considered “inferior” to animal protein. Nonetheless, Lappe suggested that this deficiency could be overcome through the practice of “food combining.”

Ultimately, she concluded that vegetarians could achieve optimal health by consuming specific combinations of foods that supply all the essential amino acids (proteins) required.

Lappe changed her perspective, declaring, “Back in 1971, I emphasized protein complementarity under the assumption that the best way to obtain sufficient protein…was to develop a protein that the body could utilize as effectively as animal protein.

By dispelling the misconception that meat is the sole source of high-quality protein, I inadvertently perpetuated another misconception. I inadvertently conveyed the idea that selecting foods required careful consideration in order to obtain adequate protein without meat.

In reality, it is simpler than I initially believed…As long as individuals are consuming enough calories, they are practically guaranteed to meet their protein needs.” Despite being scientifically debunked, the concept of food combining continues to persist in modern times.

Although Lappe eventually revised her views on food combining in later editions of Diet for a Small Planet, the damage had already been done. Advocates of animal protein seized upon her initial position to strengthen the perception of animal protein’s superiority.

Consequently, the idea that animal protein reigns as the supreme nutrient and that consuming abundant quantities of it is necessary for good health became firmly entrenched in the minds of the majority.

Organizations like the American Dietetic Association and the World Health Organization have reevaluated their views on “food combining” and the quality of plant protein. They now understand that plant protein sources can offer all the necessary amino acids, eliminating the need for deliberate food combinations.

The WHO recommends a protein intake of fifty grams per 2,200 calories. Despite these changes, the perception of animal protein as superior remains deeply ingrained, leading to plant protein being overlooked in many cases.

In 2015, the WHO finally gathered adequate data to assess the harmful effects of consuming processed meat and red meat on health. After reviewing over 800 studies on various ethnic groups’ diets worldwide, a group of WHO scientists found strong evidence linking processed meat consumption to a higher risk of colorectal cancer.

Additionally, the evidence indicated a positive correlation with an increased risk of stomach cancer. The classification of processed meat as “carcinogenic to humans” by the World Health Organization has led to significant concerns.

This places processed meat in the same category as cigarettes, alcohol, and arsenic, all of which are known to be harmful to human health. Additionally, the consumption of red meat has been classified as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” further highlighting the potential risks associated with its consumption.

The combination of these studies has unequivocally established that the intake of animal protein fosters the growth of cancer cells, while plant-protein is not only suitable but also preferable for regulating growth and preventing cancer development.

Moreover, these findings have compelled scientists to reconsider their initial belief that animal protein surpasses plant protein in terms of superiority. While scientists and health organizations have altered their views on animal protein, its consumption and promotion remain steadfast in the Western diet. The meat industry is skilled at preserving itself and endorsing the consumption of animal-based foods.


Animal Protein Subverts Health

Dr. Campbell’s early studies involved Filipino children who consumed diets high in animal protein, revealing a potential connection to increased liver cancer rates. This led him to suspect that diets rich in animal protein could be a risk factor for liver cancer.

The research by Madhavan and Gopalan also backed up this suspicion, even though their original hypothesis pointed towards low-protein diets as a potential cause of liver cancer. The outcomes were contrary to their expectations.

The experiment involved administering the carcinogen aflatoxin to rats, with some rats being provided diets containing 20 percent animal protein while others were given diets containing only 5 percent animal protein.

The carcinogen aflatoxin alone is unable to initiate and sustain the transformation of healthy cells into cancerous cells; it requires an agent for this purpose. In this case, animal protein acted as the agent.

Remarkably, all the rats that consumed the 20 percent protein diet developed liver cancer, while none of the rats on the 5 percent protein diet developed this disease.

These results prompted them to conduct their own research, focusing on the impact of animal protein on the development of liver cancer. Dr. Campbell and his team were inspired by the findings of the study conducted on Filipino children and the Madhavan and Gopalan study.



These results prompted them to conduct their own research, focusing on the impact of animal protein on the development of liver cancer. Dr. Campbell specifically selected casein as the protein for his research, which is primarily found in milk, cheese, and processed meats such as hot dogs and hamburgers.

The rats in his study were exposed to a carcinogen and were divided into groups that were provided with diets containing 5 percent, 12 percent, and 20 percent protein. Rats in the study typically lived for one hundred weeks.

Those rats that were given a 20 percent protein diet alongside the carcinogen developed aggressive tumors and passed away well before reaching that age. Conversely, rats on a 5 percent protein diet remained healthy within the same timeframe.

Tumor growth was halted when rats were switched from a 20 percent to a 5 percent protein diet at forty weeks. Rats on a 12 percent protein diet showed minimal tumor formation. Tumor development increased drastically as the protein percentage rose to 20 percent.

Although the experiments were conducted on rats, the human body exhibits comparable reactions to rats. The response of rats to the carcinogen and animal protein was generalized to be similar in humans. Dr. Campbell’s recommendation is to limit animal protein intake to no more than 10 percent in order to minimize the risk of cancer.

Carcinogens are absorbed by individuals through pollution and chemical contamination in the air, water, and food they consume. These harmful substances play a role in causing mutations in cells.

When combined with a diet that includes animal protein exceeding 10 percent of daily calorie intake, the body’s immune system becomes overwhelmed and its ability to eliminate these carcinogens is compromised.


Animal Protein Subverts Health

Factors like viruses, sunlight radiation, radioactive materials, genetics, nutritional imbalances, carcinogens, and stress can all contribute to cancer development. The ozone layer is meant to safeguard life on earth from excessive sun radiation, but industrial pollution is weakening its defense against harmful UV radiation.

Nature serves as a defense mechanism against harmful viruses that arise within the ecosystem. The immune system, equipped with white blood cells, microphages, and antibodies, acts as a shield against viruses and other pathogens.

The consumption of plants also plays a role in protecting against pathogens. Phytonutrients present in plants, composed of organic elements, serve as a defense mechanism against viruses, bacteria, and other harmful organisms.

The human body utilizes these phytonutrients to promote health and prevent cancer, despite health organizations not recognizing them as essential for well-being. While nature provides safeguards against cancer caused by natural elements, the body faces difficulties in dealing with cancer caused by human-made factors.

The introduction of radiation and pollution into the environment, along with the consumption of artificial chemicals in processed foods and medicines, disrupts the body’s balance. Consequently, this disruption leads to mental and physical stress, which has a detrimental effect on our biology and genes.

Though there are multiple agents that can cause cancer, many believe the chemicals that pollute our environment, and that are used in the harvesting, packaging, and processing of our foods, are the main causes of cancer.

Regardless of the agent, cancer develops in three stages: initiation, promotion, and progression. Aqiyl Aniys refers to chemicals as the agent within the three stages of cancer development. It is widely accepted among scientists that carcinogens exert their main effects during the initiation phase of cancer development.

This stage involves the initial bonding of chemicals to cells. Once these carcinogens are ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin, they circulate in the bloodstream. The majority of carcinogens are soluble in fat and have an affinity for fat cells.

To aid in their removal from the body, the liver produces enzymes that convert carcinogens into water-soluble metabolites. Regrettably, there are occasions when the complete conversion process fails to capture small amounts of carcinogens, resulting in the formation of highly destructive metabolites that attack DNA, RNA, and proteins.

Despite this challenge, the human body possesses remarkable resilience and can repair a significant portion of the damage inflicted. It is estimated that between 99 and 99.9 percent of the affected cells can be successfully restored.



However, if the cells remain unrepaired and undergo replication, mutations occur. These mutations occur rapidly during the initiation stage and can manifest within a few days. Nonetheless, under favorable circumstances, the body can effectively halt the replication of mutated cells, as highlighted in Dr. Campbell’s study.

After mutation, cancer progresses to the promotion stage, where mutated cells reproduce to create a substantial mass. This stage can last for several years. The final stage, progression, involves the growth of tumors into large masses that can metastasize to other areas of the body rapidly.

Cancer development can be controlled by manipulating the presence of promoters and antipromoters. Dr. Campbell’s research revealed a push-pull mechanism, where an increase in promoters led to a higher likelihood of cancer development. Conversely, an abundance of antipromoters resulted in regression.

By utilizing antipromoters, it is possible to maintain cancer in a stable state of regression, even in the presence of mutated cells. In Dr. Campbell’s rat experiments, animal-based protein acted as a promoter, while its removal acted as an antipromoter.

Furthermore, nutritional imbalances acted as promoters, whereas balanced nutrition acted as an antipromoter. Dr. Campbell highlighted the impact of nutrient levels on cancer development, noting that high-fat diets can lead to the growth of early pancreatic cancer clusters and an elevated risk of pancreatic cancer.

Conversely, increasing the consumption of antioxidant carotenoids has been shown to decrease the risk of liver cancer, while reducing carotenoid intake has been associated with an increased risk of liver cancer.

As we distance ourselves from wholesome plant-based diets abundant in minerals, vitamins, phytonutrients, and fiber, and instead adopt diets centered on meat, dairy, and processed foods, we unknowingly contribute to the creation of an environment that encourages cancer growth and disrupts the natural balance established within our bodies and the Earth’s ecosystem.

Despite the ability of carcinogens to modify DNA and create harmful mutated cells, the final outcome of whether these cells transform into cancerous tumors is not solely determined by them.

The regulation and replication of mutated cells are under the influence of nutrition. In fact, nutrition plays a crucial role in controlling both the promotion and potentially even the progression stages of cancer development.


Animal Protein Subverts Health

The US meat industry annually raises and slaughters close to ten billion animals to meet the demand for food consumption, which is approximately thirty-one times the population of the United States.

The implementation of factory-farming techniques has enabled the production of such a large quantity of animals for food, but unfortunately, it comes at the expense of the well-being of these animals. The primary focus of the factory-farming industry is to maximize output while minimizing costs, often disregarding the welfare of the animals.

Consequently, the major corporations operating these factory farms have discovered that they can generate higher profits by confining animals in cramped spaces, despite the increased risk of illness and mortality among the animals.

Agreeing with Paul McCartney’s statement in his video: “If slaughter houses had glass walls, everyone would be vegetarian.” It is evident there is a natural food chain or feeding hierarchy in nature. Some animals feed on plants, and yes, some animals feed on the animals that feed on plants.

The key contrast lies in the fact that natural animal consumption supports the animals’ healthy growth, acknowledging their emotions and pain, while factory-farming deems animals as mere objects without any concern for their well-being.

Despite the atrocities, some individuals rationalize the consumption of animals, overlooking the unethical treatment. It is simple to disregard the suffering of factory-farmed animals unless one witnesses it firsthand behind the glass walls of the facility.

Cows, chickens, turkeys, and other animals are squeezed into cramped spaces to make the most of available area. Thousands of chickens and turkeys are crammed into small areas, living in filthy conditions surrounded by their own waste.

These animals are denied the chance to exercise and are fed large quantities of feed to expedite their growth and size, as well as their egg or milk output. Animals are also genetically engineered and given growth hormones to speed up their growth process and reach an unnatural size.

Despite the likelihood of disease outbreaks due to the poor living conditions, factory farmers administer antibiotics in large quantities to prevent deaths. Factory-farmed animals are deliberately raised for the sole purpose of being slaughtered for meat, leading to a life filled with constant suffering.

The cramped and unclean conditions, combined with the absence of physical activity, contribute to the proliferation of diseases. Moreover, instead of allowing cows to consume their natural diet of grass, factory-farming methods rely on feeding them corn, soy, and hay, disregarding their genetic and biological needs.



The decision to switch the cattle’s diet to grain was made to increase their weight for consumption purposes.

While corn, soy, and hay are not part of their natural diet, they are still preferred over the alternative food sources used when supplies are scarce. In times of shortage, cattle farmers have resorted to feeding their livestock candy to keep costs low.

Factory farmers have been providing cattle with gummy bears, cookies, chocolate, fruit loops, and various other candies. These sugary treats are packed with detrimental substances such as high-fructose corn syrup, MSG, hydrogenated oils, pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, acrylamides, artificial flavorings, artificial colorings, and artificial sweeteners like aspartame.

These chemically infused processed foods pose a threat to the well-being of cattle, just as they do to humans. Factory farmers have turned to feeding cattle sawdust, audaciously touting it as a healthy alternative.

Sawdust, predominantly made up of cellulose, is deemed a carbohydrate, providing factory farmers with a rationale for its use in cattle feed. Nevertheless, sawdust contains lignin, a compound that impedes digestion.

To eliminate lignin from cellulose, producers utilize nitric acid, a highly corrosive mineral acid commonly found in the production of explosives. Unfortunately, the presence of nitric acid residue on the cellulose can be harmful to the digestive system and overall health of the cattle.

Chicken feces serve as an unconventional feed option for cattle. The significant amount of chicken feces produced can be costly to dispose of properly. Feeding cattle chicken feces not only helps manage the waste but also provides the cattle with protein.

This practice allows factory farmers to address both issues efficiently by utilizing chicken feces as a source of nutrition for their livestock. The presence of metal, glass, rocks, and various foreign objects in chicken feces is not uncommon.

This is primarily because chicken carcasses are mixed with the chicken litter, potentially introducing pathogens like Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, and/or Clostridium botulinum.

To mitigate any risks, the chicken feces undergoes a comprehensive processing method to eliminate debris and neutralize pathogens before being used as feed for cattle. However, it is crucial to question the level of care dedicated to this process, particularly when considering the distressing treatment of cattle from the very beginning.

Factory farmers also provide cattle with crab, shrimp, and fish guts as a source of protein. Additionally, they supplement their diet with limestone for calcium. While cows do consume this food, it is not a natural part of their diet.

Similar to humans, cattle have the ability to consume various types of food, but it does not necessarily mean that all foods are beneficial for them. One can only wonder about the impact on their digestive systems.

The disruption of the cattle’s natural daily life activities and eating habits carries notable implications. The utilization of factory-farming techniques causes the cattle to develop a wide array of diseases at an accelerated rate, compelling farmers to administer considerable amounts of antibiotics to ensure their survival.

The stomachs of cattle have always harbored milder forms of E. coli, but their transition to an unnatural grain-based diet has led to an overall increase in the total population of E. coli, including the pathogenic strain O157:H7.

Previously, the majority of these microbes resided in the cows’ gut and attached to their meat. However, they were effectively eradicated by the strong acids found in the human stomachs, as they had adapted to survive in the neutral pH environment of the cattle’s rumen.

The acidity of the rumen in corn-fed feedlot steers has now become equivalent to that of the human stomach, resulting in the emergence of new acid-resistant strains of E. coli, such as O157:H7.

MRSA infections are on the rise, with factory-farmed animals being a likely culprit. Recent studies in Europe have shown a strong link between MRSA and pig farming. Animals are increasingly infected with MRSA, passing it on to humans through contact and consumption.

The antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses challenges for treatment. Unsanitary factory-farming methods are also contributing to the increase in Campylobacter and salmonella.

Over 1.3 million Americans are estimated to contract foodborne diseases annually, leading to symptoms like abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, nausea, and temporary paralysis.

The prevalence of drug-resistant Campylobacter has been increasing, with its resistance levels climbing from 13 percent in 1997 to nearly 25 percent in 2011.

A study conducted in 2010 by Consumer Reports indicated that 62 percent of chicken available in supermarkets is infected with Campylobacter, while 14 percent carries salmonella. Salmonella can result in symptoms such as pain, diarrhea, fever, nausea, headaches, and vomiting.

The development of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), commonly referred to as mad cow disease, is a consequence of factory-farming methods that involve feeding cattle with parts of slaughtered cattle.

A considerable portion of the population continues to lack the ability to form a bond or exhibit empathy towards animals such as cattle, who are subjected to inhumane treatment, solely because they are animals.

Many individuals find comfort in the belief that animals exist primarily for the benefit of humans. However, if people are unable to empathize with animals, it is crucial to recognize this as a human issue.

The consumption of meat from animals plagued with diseases not only transmits these diseases to humans who consume their meat but also has far more detrimental consequences on the human body compared to the naturally raised animals of previous generations.

The human body is suffering grave consequences due to the consumption of disease-laden meat. Unbeknownst to a large number of individuals, these animal products are silently transmitting diseases, posing a significant danger.

It is essential to acknowledge that the prevailing rate of disease affliction among human beings is anything but normal, and it is imperative not to overlook this fact.

Dr. Greger’s research article emphasizes the profound alterations made by Homo sapiens to the ecological landscape, which have affected the interactions between other species and their pathogens.

The establishment of industries by mankind has disrupted the intelligent order of life, leading to an imbalance and providing an opportunity for pathogens to multiply beyond the boundaries set by natural patterns.


Animal Protein Subverts Health

Before writing this conclusion, all images for this article were picked from weanimalsmedia.org. The mission at We Animals Media is to bring visibility to hidden animals through compelling photojournalism. 

As the world’s leading animal photojournalism agency, they document the stories of animals used for human purposes — for food, fashion, entertainment and experimentation — and connect those stories to the individuals, organizations and media who can amplify their reach. 

I selected images from We Animals Media with the intention of evoking deep emotional and spiritual responses from the reader. As we explore the path of Kundalini awakening and self-mastery through the teachings of the serpent, it is important to note that certain aspects of this blog might elicit emotional reactions from readers.

These aspects include shedding light on organized religion, the manipulation by dark sorcerers, the impact of fluoride, vaccines, meat consumption, and the notion that masturbation/ejaculation is considered as a form of demise.

Since time immemorial, the serpent has been revered as a guardian figure. It acts as a potent guide for those who venture into the realms of mysteries and esoteric knowledge. However, when this wisdom is met with fear, the serpent itself becomes a target of apprehension.

As a result, societies establish regulations to control and limit the dissemination of such knowledge. In cultures where the serpent is considered taboo, individuals who associate themselves with it often face persecution or are banished.

This historical trend is evident in the experiences of various spiritual groups, all of whom interestingly followed a vegetarian way of life by the way.

The serpent’s key lesson emphasizes embracing our true selves, urging us to break free from societal norms and expectations. Its teachings focus on liberation and self-discovery, encouraging us to reject conformity and embrace individuality.

Unleashing the inner serpent demands going beyond the limitations of ordinary consciousness and beliefs. Given the contamination of the food supply, the optimal yet demanding solution is to grow your own fruits and vegetables. If this is not feasible, consider obtaining produce from farmer’s markets or small organic stores.

Kundalini awakening and the expansion of higher consciousness are exclusively promoted by a vegan diet. This is clearly emphasized in teachings across various religious and spiritual practices.

The teachings of every ancient philosopher and the wisdom passed down through the mystery schools of different civilizations have consistently stressed the crucial role of a vegan/vegetarian diet.

Embracing self-mastery, awakening the Kundalini, reaching higher consciousness, practicing semen retention, and elevating your vibration to a higher frequency all point to one conclusion: veganism is the sole choice. There is no place for meat on the spiritual journey.

The term ahimsa is commonly interpreted as non-violence in Western culture, however, its true meaning of “non-harming” extends beyond that. Ahimsa requires a proactive approach to minimize harm in the world, showing compassion towards all living beings and the planet as a whole.

It involves acting with empathy and respect for life in every aspect of our lives. Taking personal responsibility for the welfare of all sentient beings is crucial. Ahimsa teaches us to work towards reducing disorder and suffering in the world, while fostering harmony, compassion, and love in our lives. By doing so, we can also alleviate the restless nature of the mind.

A vegan way of life (no flesh foods, eggs, dairy, leather, or other animal by-products) actively creates six aspects of ahimsa: (1) compassion and non-cruelty toward animals; (2) preserving the Earth and its ecology; (3) feeding the hungry; (4) preserving human life; (5) preservation of personal health; (6) inspiring peace.

Without a doubt, every living being causes some degree of harm to other creatures or the environment. Even the act of consuming plants can result in the loss of their lives, which is why strict followers of non-violence, like the Jains, abstain from eating root vegetables and focus solely on fruits, seeds, and grains.

Nevertheless, plants are a natural source of sustenance and occupy a much lower position on the food chain compared to animal-based foods. Hence, embracing a vegan diet serves as a powerful means to significantly reduce harm.

Veganism is a way to reduce overall harm to life, considering that the animals raised for consumption have consumed numerous plants before their slaughter. Reflect on the amount of food a cow must consume to produce a single steak.

Our act of eating involves taking a bite out of the living planet itself. The food we consume represents the consciousness of the Earth. If our eating process lacks love and compassion, it will inevitably impact all other aspects of our lives.

In Sanskrit, Anna or food is the initial name for God or Brahma. Through eating, we partake in the entirety of the universe and demonstrate our unity with God or Life.

Every element within the vast expanse of the cosmos serves as nourishment, thus what we consume holds divine essence, and consequently nourishes the depths of our souls. This profound understanding of the impact of food on our consciousness is not confined to the teachings of Yoga alone.

Pythagoras, the illustrious Greek mathematician and philosopher, once proclaimed, “As long as mankind continues to slaughter animals, they will perpetuate violence amongst themselves. Indeed, those who sow the seeds of murder and infliction cannot harvest the bounties of joy and Love.”

Explore our page for further information on raw food diet and veganism: https://theserpentsway.com/raw-food-diet-fasting/.



Alkaline Plant Based Diet – https://amzn.to/3UP9qj8

Gain wisdom Through Practiced Knowledge – https://amzn.to/4dO92Kv

Awakening The Ancient Power Of Snake – https://amzn.to/3wHyvos

Spiritual Nutrition – https://amzn.to/3wvY0ZR


© Copyright 2023. All rights reserved.

Verified by MonsterInsights